I have considered critical comments that had been received about the recent post describing my trip to Stonehenge.
Example: The letter is all nice and pleasant, but there is no evidence or proof that you actually visited the site. The excellent photo was unrepresentative of your usual ill-focused and poorly framed efforts. Perhaps you simply downloaded them from the web. No photograph of you, for instance, was available to confirm your presence.
“Ah, ha,” I thought.
I was, of course, prepared for skepticism. In fact, I had the exact remedy for comment at hand: A self-portrait with Stonehenge in the background, poorly framed, ill-focused and featuring inadequate lighting.
Example: The letter is all nice and pleasant, but there is no evidence or proof that you actually visited the site. The excellent photo was unrepresentative of your usual ill-focused and poorly framed efforts. Perhaps you simply downloaded them from the web. No photograph of you, for instance, was available to confirm your presence.
“Ah, ha,” I thought.
I was, of course, prepared for skepticism. In fact, I had the exact remedy for comment at hand: A self-portrait with Stonehenge in the background, poorly framed, ill-focused and featuring inadequate lighting.
No comments:
Post a Comment